What does she look for as a judge? Which is more important, type or
movement? What handler tricks bug her and how important is grooming? What you
need to know when entering under this top breeder-judge. We think you’ll agree,
Beverly Vics is a “good judge” destined to be a “great judge.”
WHAT WAS YOUR
FIRST BREED? AND FIRST SHOWDOG?
breed was a GSD from my
mother-in-law's pet. My first KC breed that brought me to involvement in the
sport of purebred dogs was an Alaskan Malamute, Nanook. I bought him from a pet
shop. I did show him, in a Northern Breed Specialty fun match in NJ. He was DQ'd
for being monorchid. The judge said he was a very nice Malamute but had only one
testicle, so I couldn't show him. I then proceeded to find me a REAL breeder!!
The first dog I ever showed for points was Alaskan Malamute (later CH) N Bar J's
Lady Gwenevier of TOBE. [photo 1] I took my first 2 points at my first show under J. D.
Jones. My knees were shaking I was so nervous.
WERE YOU EVER A
about 3 minutes, LOL I tried professional handling because I LOVED showing
dogs. But after dealing with two or three clients, I quit showing for other
people. I'd tell them "Don't feed the dog if he sits down", simple? yes? NO!!
They'd bring me the dog, he would see bait and plant his butt solidly on the
ground. I gave that up real quick!! Loved the dogs; could NOT deal with the
WHICH DOG DID YOU MOST
ENJOY SHOWING AND WHY?
hard question. I loved showing ALL the dogs. Most of all I loved winning!! So
the dogs that won the most were, logically, the ones I enjoyed showing the most.
My first special, sired by
Sachmo, Ch TOBE's Peking Jumbo, CD might be the one I remember best. He was my
FIRST real top winning dog. He holds a special place in my heart. My first Group
placement was a GR I under John Patterson with Jumbo. I remember it like it was
yesterday... What a thrill. Jumbo had qualified for his first leg on his CD that
same day and I have to tell you, when I jumped out of the van that morning, I
jumped right into a pile of guess what? So the saying "you must have stepped in
it!!" YES I DID!! That was over 40 years ago.
WHICH DOG WAS YOUR TOP
record holder was, as most people know, Ch TOBE's Return of the Jedai, a.k.a. Ben,
shown below winning under judge Mel Downing. He won 27 all breed bests in
show, countless Groups and Breeds. Back then, that was the record for all-breed bests for an Akita. I owner/handled most of my dogs, and I owner/handled Ben to
his first three all-breed Bests. Then handed him off to a professional handler
I could not show him in as many shows as was needed to really rank
a dog. Ben also still holds the record for Bests-of-Breed at the very
prestigious Westminster KC – 8 in a row...
[Photo 4] Ch BIS-BISS
TOBE's Return of the Jedai gaiting at Westminster is shown below.
He was also owner/handled to his first 3
BOB wins at Westminster KC.
WHEN, AND WHY DID YOU
DECIDE TO BECOME A JUDGE?
it is a natural progression to go from breeding; successful breeding, on to
judging. When Ben was getting older, I knew I'd never take that ride again, so I
wanted to move on to bigger and better things. I knew from the first time I
judged a match that I wanted to judge seriously. I absolutely love judging. I
believe that breeds progress and grow from the "teamwork" between breeders,
exhibitors and judges. Breeders breed TO winners; judges CREATE the winners.
Breeders exhibit what they hope will WIN; judges choose the winners. However, on
the other side, Judges can only give wins to the dogs that enter so if you, as a
breeder/exhibitor want to direct the future of your breed, then show good, typey dogs. If judges can't find them, get
into judges' education with your national breed club. Teach the judges what is
and is not a good Bulldog, Akita, Malamute, etc. If you want judges to know
your breed, teach them. We learn from what we see; we imprint on what we see
over and over again. So if you want judges to give wins to good dogs, you have
to enter them.
FOR WHICH BREEDS WERE
YOU FIRST APPROVED?
In 1990 I
was approved for Akitas and Alaskan Malamutes. I believe I am a very good judge.
I hope to, some day, be a great judge. But I guess all judges believe that. My
husband, John, likes to point out "If you are crazy, do you know you're crazy or
do you think you are the sane one and the rest of the world is crazy?" I
believe I’m a good judge because I have an "eye" for a good dog. I accept the
responsibility to learn correct breed type for each breed I am approved to
judge. I work to uphold that standard of excellence each time I walk in the ring
to judge dogs. I truly believe that the best dog, in my opinion, should win
whatever class is in front of me, and I do my absolute best to find him. I know
I make mistakes, but I don't dwell on them and I learn from every one of them.
NAME TWO PEOPLE WHO
INFLUENCED YOU THEN AND NOW?
THEN!! Sheila Balch was my role model. When
I started showing Alaskan Mals, Sheila was the REALLY BIG winner!! She was what
BJ Andrews became in later years. My first dog show (as a spectator) was Bronx
Co KC, the week after the Garden (Westminster), circa 1967 maybe. Sheila had
just the previous week, won the Garden with Wooly Bully. I thought my pet shop
dog, Nanook, was just as nice as Wooley Bully, so I sought out how to show dogs
with fervor! As years went on, Sheila consistently beat me. I wanted to be
Sheila Balch..... I wanted to be a big winner. I watched handlers handle and I
watched Sheila win!! The rest is history.
Mazzola. If you knew Sheila and John back then, you would know that they were
polar opposites. Sheila HATED John Mazzola and his puppy mill, N-BAR-J Alaskan
Malamutes. I bought my first 3 bitches and a dog from John. He sold me a whole
breeding program, right there in the back seat of my 1965 Pontiac Tempest! Yes,
John was a puppy mill... and I started out all wrong but I learned a lot from
him. A bunch of us would sit around a campfire outside John's home/kennel and
he would talk dogs! Breeding programs! Pedigrees! And the importance of
The rest of us would just listen. WOW! I learned sooo much about
those things from him. He was such a knowledgeable dog man. When I later sought
out an Akita foundation bitch... it was John's pontificating about pedigrees and
breeding programs that influenced my choice of Ch Lijo's Spirit of
to be my
foundation bitch. I picked her at one day old based on her perfectly inbred
pedigree. She influenced the great dogs I later produced until the last
generation of TOBE Akitas was gone. And today, I still see her influence in dogs
that go back to TOBE dogs.
I began judging, I got to know judges like Mel Downing. He was a REAL dog man, a
GREAT judge! I had always shown to Mel because I believed he knew a good dog
when he saw one and I believed him to be as honest as the day is long. Early in
my judging days, I had the honor of stewarding for him. We chatted in our "off"
time and he said to me "Always remember one thing, judge the dogs honestly. You
will make mistakes, but you will learn from them and become a great judge. If
you judge any other way, you'll never learn a damn thing." So, you exhibitors
out there, if you think I made a mistake last week, know that I am a work in
progress and I will get better at this judging thing!! I also learned from
Estelle Cohen, Bunny Hyman and Ellie Rottman. For personal reasons, Estelle was
Fournier. Jean is, today, my judging career role model. She is knowledgeable,
honest, and respected for it - everything I aspire to be.
DO YOU STILL OWN OR
actually, I do. I own two Champion Havanese and my little bitch is due in two
weeks to give me my first litter of puppies in almost 20 years! I am very
WHAT DO YOU DO IN YOUR
OTHER LIFE? PROFESSION, HOBBY?
In my "real
life", my husband, John, and I have our own Accounting/Income Tax Practice. Last
year I was laid off as a clinical data programmer and went to work with John in
the office. Other than my passion for judging dogs, John and I love to play
Pickle Ball with our "non-doggie" friends here in the community. I also love
photography and have recently gotten into making slide show/movies; it's fun and
fascinating. I am working on a History of Great Dogs for the Akita community. I
think it's fabulous and I am having fun putting it all together.
ASSIGNMENTS OF INTEREST TO YOU?
enjoy foreign judging assignments but have limited my foreign travel to one a
year. Last year I did more and it was way too time-consuming and exhausting. I
love the foreign assignments because, in some breeds, the dogs are of better
quality outside this country. People in Europe really love their dogs. The
entries are incredible. You can only judge a couple of breeds in a day because
there are so many dogs. Europe recognizes more breeds than AKC. I have met some
new breeds that, if I were younger, I'd be importing and becoming a foundation
DO YOU THINK THE SPORT
IS BETTER TODAY THAN 10 YEARS AGO?
No I don't.
I think some things about the sport are better than 10 years ago, but many
things are not. The problem I have with the sport today is exactly the same
problem I had with the sport 30 years ago. Politics, bad judging, and newcomers
who think they know it all and have nothing to learn. Too many judges read the
Dog News every week and simply put up the dogs that are advertised. Recently,
two judges said similar things to me at totally different times/places.
Something like "Have you seen Mr. Big Handler's new special? I gave him a group
last week; he's beautiful and he's out of Big Winners Kennel, you know, Mr. Big
said "I don't know Big Handler or Big Breeder, and frankly I don't want to know
who owns or handles what dog." That's not what it's about! Okay, so I killed a
couple of giants last week.... aarrggghhhh... I am sure my name's mud again with
some people. I put up the dogs I think best fit the standard... sometimes its
Ch Big Winner and sometimes it's Ch Little Guy's Owner Handled...right or
WHAT ABOUT THE DOGS
OVERALL? BETTER THAN 10 YEARS AGO?
yes, overall. Some, no. Akitas, specifically, since that's my first passion,
have overall, gotten sounder but are totally loosing type. We have had too many
"big" winners with poor or no type. New judges watch these Akitas win and when
they begin to judge, they then look for that "type" and think it's correct. It
is NOT! When they have a dog in their ring that actually has good type, they
totally miss it. Some judges fault judge and will not forgive a little in
movement when they might actually have a dog with wonderful type. but maybe it
doesn't fly around the ring or move as "clean" going away or coming back, so
they find the generic good moving, pretty, flashy dog with NO TYPE. I see this
happening in too many breeds. Talk to the breeders, they will often tell you the
same thing. The top winners are many times NOT correct in type. Occasionally
you get one that has it all but not too many, unfortunately. Bottom line?
Nothing changes if nothing changes.
DO YOU THINK THE JUDGE
APPROVAL SYSTEM IS OKAY TODAY?
I think the approval was OK yesterday, then
today they change it and tomorrow they change it again. I feel like they told me
they wanted me to pass the Bar Exam in order to be a judge, so I study, spend
thousands of dollars to get that degree and apply to judge dogs, then they tell
me I need to have an MD, not a JD and that’s not fair. I just spent years and
thousands to do what they told me to do and discover that's all for naught and I
have to start all over again. I just wish they'd settle on a system and leave it
alone. I'm easy... I do what I'm told but it's frustrating when we keep getting
told we need different things in order to pass.
When I put
in my app for additional breeds, I have a problem with the fact that some clerk
at AKC who doesn't know one tenth of what I know about purebred dogs, looks over
the app and decides if I qualify to be approved for those breeds. I think
judges' approvals should be based on whether a judge does a credible job or not.
Just that simple. Those judges who do a good job ought to move on to more
breeds. Those that do not do at least a reasonable job should not get more
breeds. And if I am one of those judges, someone should tell me and I'll walk
thing, frankly and IMHO, the things I learned about Poodles 20 or 30 years ago
from people like Ellie Rottman, I can't unlearn. AKC says it doesn't count.....
I think it counts big time. I learned it, and it is as applicable today as it
was when it was learned a long time ago.
DID YOU THINK SO WHEN
YOU WERE APPLYING?
again, did what I was told to do; bred the required 10-4-2, passed the tests,
survived my interview, got thru
provisionals. But back then, you had the good-ole-boy network. Now, you might
think that's a bad thing (maybe in some respects it is) but most of those
good-ole-boys knew a good dog when they saw one and they knew a good judge when
they saw one. They watched me judge and they knew that I could find a good dog.
It was just that simple. Now it's all about components and seminars. All the
components and seminars in the world will not make a good judge if he doesn't
understand type and structure.... you either have an "eye for a dog" or you
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT
DRESS CODES FOR HANDLERS? JUDGES?
heard of any dress codes. I do, however, feel our sport deserves respect and
that appropriate attire shows that respect and keeps our sport professional. I
try to dress "appropriately" whenever I go to a show, whether I am judging or
not. I am an approved AKC judge. I feel that I should represent that position as
honorable and professional. I believe all judges should be dressed
appropriately whenever they walk in the ring and exhibitors should do the same.
This is not a fashion show, shortest skirt, or biggest boob contest! Treat this
sport with the respect it deserves whatever your part in it is.
Juniors recently. My best Junior was quite inappropriately attired - her blouse
was showing way too much, shall I say. I gave her the win anyway because she is
an excellent handler and bottom line, that's what it's about. But when I saw her
later, and she politely thanked me for the win, I did tell her that I thought
her attire did not reflect respect for the sport or professionalism on her part.
I hope she took me seriously and cleaned up her act.
AS A JUDGE, WHAT BUGS
Really, nothing really bugs me in the
ring....LOL.... I have such a great time judging, I do my job and let others
(handlers and stewards) do theirs. But if I had to find some things?
would be exhibitors with a really good dog that handle so badly I can't see the
dog's qualities. TRAIN your dog, people; and go to handling classes. If you're
going to be an owner handler, LEARN to handle. If you believe you have a good
dog, and lost to a professional handler who, you believe, doesn't have as good a
dog as you do; don't automatically assume the judge is political and only puts
up handlers. If I CAN'T SEE your dog, I can't give it the win no matter how
great a dog he may be!! I really try to see the dog beyond the handling... both
bad handling AND the proficient handler who tries to keep me from finding
faults, but sometimes, it's really challenging.
Number 2 is
racing around the ring because a good moving dog moves well at any speed. A bad
moving dog actually looks worse when the handler is trying to fool me into
thinking he can cover ground when in fact, he can't. Hmm... and throwing bait,
especially when it hits me or my steward.... HOW RUDE!! Hmmm.... funny, they
are all handler issues... not dog issues. I love the dogs!
WHAT GROOMING FAD
DRIVES YOU NUTS TODAY?
have any peeves about grooming. I'm judging dogs and if the dog is not groomed
properly, it's not his fault. I try to put up the best dog under the coat and
in-spite of the grooming thing. Unless of course the standard forbids over
grooming or trimming or calls for something specific. Then even the best dog
can't (according to the standard) win unless he is so far superior to the others
that I absolutely have to forgive the grooming.
WHEN YOU LOOK DOWN THE
LINE, WHAT DRAWS YOUR EYE?
type first and foremost! Grabs me... won't let go.... Flashy/Showy dogs will
catch the eye but they have to have breed type.
TO WHICH DO YOU GIVE
PRIORITY, TYPE OR MOVEMENT?
TYPE... TYPE.... I quantify that, however, by saying that overall type
encompasses CORRECT movement for it's breed. The Akita standard calls for
"strides of moderate length" so an Akita who flies around the ring does not have
correct type. Havanese calls for an unbalanced structure (short upper arm,
normal length of bones in the rear). Movement must re-balance the structure in
order for foot timing to be balanced. Here again, movement is an intricate part
of breed type. The Bulldog who does not show all four feet when he moves (coming
& going) is not correct in type. It is more than head type...it is ALL of it...
head, body and proportions, correct coat, tail set, balance, and yes, BREED
ON A SCALE OF 1 – 10,
RANK SHOWMANSHIP AND PRESENTATION.
and presentation is in direct correlation with each breed standard. Overall, I
try my best, as I said earlier, to look past such things. So I guess on a scale
of 1-10, showmanship and presentation are down the line at, maybe a 2 or 3. As
stated earlier, if the dog is not presented (handled) correctly so I can see and
assess it, I cannot give it a win. So presentation, i.e., handling ability has
to count some.
thing; certain breeds call for specific presentation (grooming/clips or loose
leash) by the standard; Poodles and Havanese for example, where correct
presentation is called for in the written standard. When judging these breeds, a
judge is bound to give more weight to presentation than when judging a breed
where presentation is not mentioned in the standard. It is my responsibility to
learn how a particular breed is supposed to be presented. But if the
presentation is not established in the standard as approved by AKC, presentation
cannot play a significant role in actually choosing the best dog.
Showmanship? It's really hard not to look at a "showey" dog! One of the things
that really catches my eye when a class first walks into the ring is the dog's
showmanship. His attitude or flash, if you will. It is my job, however, to look
past attitude, training, and showmanship. Recently I judged a breed for the
first time. I had a pretty good entry in both numbers and quality and several
specials in the Best-of-Breed class. One was particularly "showy" and had a
beautiful/excellent head. He also moved well, overall, for the breed. He caught
my eye and I kept looking back to him because he commanded my attention. The BAD
thing for him was that he commanded attention...LOL No matter how many times I
looked at him, one particular BREED CHARACTERISTIC was totally lacking and
moving or standing, he never showed me that very important breed characteristic.
He didn't win. Later, a breeder of 30 years of that breed told me I did a great
job with his breed.
WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU
GIVE TO TODAY’S ASPIRING HANDLER?
important features of the breed (standard) you want to handle. Find dogs that
are good dogs and actually exhibit strengths in areas important to the standard.
Learn about structure and movement and how such things relate to the specific
breed standard of the dogs you handle. I think you need to judge the dogs just
as a judge will do before you will be a good a handler. Then train the dog to
show like a million bucks!
If you have
done #1 correctly, you will know what the dog's strengths and weaknesses are and
can show off the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of each dog as an
individual. Don't show every dog the same, even within the same breed. Every
breed is different, every dog is different. If you have learned about dogs in
general and the breed specifically, you will know each dog’s great qualities and
show him accordingly. Also, don't pull your entry from competition because Ch Mr
Big Winner is at the shows this weekend. You have to be in it to win it! If you
have a good dog, if you have confidence and believe in that dog, you will get
recognition. Maybe you'll win... maybe not... but you will gain respect from
other handlers, owners, and judges alike. If you think he's a good dog, the
judge just might agree with you. And always keep dog shows in perspective. It's
not life or death. It's a dog show. You win some, you loose some!
thing.... do NOT give me an attitude if I don't like your dog. Next year (or two
years from now) this particular dog will be done, out of the ring BUT you will
still be a handler and I will still be the judge. Maybe I'll like your next dog
better, maybe I won't, but whatever, you don't want to loose the respect of the
judging community by being a poor sport. And you DON'T want to piss me off!
AND WHAT WOULD YOU SAY
TO ASPIRING JUDGES?
handlers.... Learn what good breed type looks like and why. Judge honestly! Many
exhibitors know more than you do about their breed. They will KNOW if you know
anything about their breed. You will not gain any respect in the sport if you
don't maintain your humility. You may be the Judge, it's your ring and you have
the final say but once you walk out of the ring, you are still you. Your final
choices in the ring may be final as far as AKC is concerned, but will also
determine how much respect you get OUT of the ring; it will determine whether
you get entries from the serious dog fancy, or just newcomers and your cronies
who you put up all the time. Remember what Mel Downing said. He was right. Someone else once said "A judge
gets the quality of entry he deserves." Sometimes when I get a ring full of
pets, I get a lesson in humility and I wonder if I am doing a good job in that
breed or not! Then I turn around next week and get FABULOUS dogs. Ah, yes! My
all, keep it in perspective. Enjoy judging. Enjoy every assignment. Have fun!!
If you're not having fun and enjoying the sport at this level, GET OUT!! You're
not doing anyone any favors by judging dogs if you wish you were off playing
AND WHAT WOULD YOU SAY
TO ASPIRING BREEDERS?
handlers and judges... Learn your standard.... learn about dogs. Loose the
arrogance in looking at the dogs you have! I know you love them but look at
them very critically. Back to step 1 -learning. Then, when you have bred some
good dogs, hopefully top winners, then, and only then, you can get a little bit
arrogant and don't be afraid to do your own thing. Inbreed, after a few
generations to weed out the faults and lock in all the strengths you have bred
to refine. Don't be afraid to do things other people tell you not to do. If you
have been humble and really learned, then you have EARNED the right to think out
of the box and "do your own thing." Show dogs you know are good dogs, whether
they win or not. If they don't win, then get involved with Judges Ed in your
national club and be a positive force to bring good dogs back to the winners
show a good dog because he doesn't win. If I, as the judge, don't have a good
TYPEY dog to put up, I have to put up the best of the generic dogs I have in my
ring. Give judges good type to find and if they don't find it, then get more
involved in judges' education as I said earlier. Akitas have very little type
left in the breed because of too many big winners with no correct type. But when
I sit ringside mentoring aspiring judges, if I don't have the opportunity to say
to those new judges "look at # 12..... she has excellent type; THAT's what
you're looking for, imprint on it, cherish it" we can’t educate other judges.
Just maybe we can get enough judges to recognize it even if it's the ONLY
correct one in the ring and looks totally out of place. Being correct may be
lonely... but it's still correct.
WHICH DO YOU FEEL IS HAVING
THE GREATEST IMPACT ON REGISTRATIONS AND ENTRIES TODAY – AKC’S CURRENT DIRECTION
IN MATTERS SUCH AS MIXED BREEDS, ANIMAL RIGHTS LEGISLATION, SOME OTHER FACTOR?
THE OVERALL QUALITY OF JUDGING? OR THE ECONOMY?
AKC's arrogance is not helping. The mixed breed thing is fine! Helps financial
issues and brings more people into the sport. But overall I think the economy is
our worst enemy. Having lost my job last year, I cut back on showing. So many
people have lost their jobs. Some have lost their homes. Some are lucky if they
can keep their dogs, if they can afford to feed their "breeding program" and
remain in the sport at all. They all cut back on shows to save money for the dog
rights legislation is another big factor. I don't think it affects shows other
than indirectly. If I can't own an Akita in this town, I can't show one but back
to the economy; If I can't sell my house and buy one in a community where I CAN
own and show my Akita, then I'm in deep doo doo..... and so is the sport.
Barbara J. Andrews
Copyright © NetPlaces, Inc. / TheDogPlace All Rights Reserved, Under penalty of law, no portions thereof may reproduced or reprinted without obtaining
from the publisher-